No brah, I reacted the way I did because I suspect by the title of your account, you probably support the Second Vatican Council. I politely told you if you do, that it would be best to drop it. And you kept on talking about Timothy Flanders! I don't CARE who you are! If you support the Second Vatican Council, we have NOTHING to discuss. PERIOD. I'm I being crystal clear?!
The irony here is, if I'm not mistaken, the post is from a rabid Second Vatican Council supporter and in a interaction with me claims that pachama ISN'T a heresy! This is a person who probably ISN'T aware that his “precious” popes St. John XXIII and St. Paul VI were freemasons.
Hello Anon. I don’t know who you are. Perhaps you’d like to speak with me man to man, as a Christian. Otherwise, please stop commenting. With respect, Timothy
I was trying NOT to be presumptuous, and I'm still not. If your not the account in question, the comment doesn't apply to you. If you ARE then if the shoe fits wear it. I thought I blocked you because you blocked me. Apparently, I didn't. But if you're only interested in defending the indefensible, we have nothing to talk about. One Catholic to a man.
My apologies Mr. Flanders. I'm a former member of the false Catholic Church known as the Novus Ordo, turned Sedevacantist. I have heard about you, you are a well known apologist for this fake Catholic church. I don't think it will be expedient for us to engage in “debate” as both of us are sure of our theological positions. But you can call me Jon Quixote.
What I’m interested in is a connection with a Christian. I don’t see how I can do that if I don’t know what your name is. If you’d like to part ways amicably, perhaps that is wise. God bless. With respect, Timothy
If you weren't the person I was referring to in my OP, then I owe you the apology. If you were, I'm not bothered, I know where we stand. But if you're the Timothy Flanders apologist for the Second Vatican Council, I disagree with you vehemently and you're correct, we should leave each other alone.
I don't understand your joke, I thought you were trying to gaslight me.
No bro I was joking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Flanders
No brah, I reacted the way I did because I suspect by the title of your account, you probably support the Second Vatican Council. I politely told you if you do, that it would be best to drop it. And you kept on talking about Timothy Flanders! I don't CARE who you are! If you support the Second Vatican Council, we have NOTHING to discuss. PERIOD. I'm I being crystal clear?!
Well OK I guess we’ve spent a lot of time not really getting to know each other. God bless, Anonymous! :)
The irony here is, if I'm not mistaken, the post is from a rabid Second Vatican Council supporter and in a interaction with me claims that pachama ISN'T a heresy! This is a person who probably ISN'T aware that his “precious” popes St. John XXIII and St. Paul VI were freemasons.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hello Anon. I don’t know who you are. Perhaps you’d like to speak with me man to man, as a Christian. Otherwise, please stop commenting. With respect, Timothy
I was trying NOT to be presumptuous, and I'm still not. If your not the account in question, the comment doesn't apply to you. If you ARE then if the shoe fits wear it. I thought I blocked you because you blocked me. Apparently, I didn't. But if you're only interested in defending the indefensible, we have nothing to talk about. One Catholic to a man.
Why don’t we start here: what is your name, brother? My name is Timothy Flanders
My apologies Mr. Flanders. I'm a former member of the false Catholic Church known as the Novus Ordo, turned Sedevacantist. I have heard about you, you are a well known apologist for this fake Catholic church. I don't think it will be expedient for us to engage in “debate” as both of us are sure of our theological positions. But you can call me Jon Quixote.
Hello brother.
God forgives and I forgive. Forgive me, a sinner.
What I’m interested in is a connection with a Christian. I don’t see how I can do that if I don’t know what your name is. If you’d like to part ways amicably, perhaps that is wise. God bless. With respect, Timothy
If you weren't the person I was referring to in my OP, then I owe you the apology. If you were, I'm not bothered, I know where we stand. But if you're the Timothy Flanders apologist for the Second Vatican Council, I disagree with you vehemently and you're correct, we should leave each other alone.